SYNTHETIC DATA · CONCEPT DEMO v2
Step 1 / 3
The workflow starts with a mandate. This one is invented for the demo.
fictional mandate · REQ-2043-MTL · synthetic scenario
VP Engineering — Series B fintech, Montréal
A synthetic search brief created only for this demonstration. No real company is hiring, and no real person is described anywhere on this page.
Scrolls down to the documented profiles.
Step 2 / 3
Four fictional candidates assembled by the (demo) retrieval pass. Every claim carries an inspectable source chip — click it to read the fictional excerpt and its limits before judging anything in Step 3. Criteria chips stay neutral until a human reviews the sources.
VP Payments Infrastructure · fictional co: Northline Pay
Led a 60-engineer organization across three payments product lines.
Fictional source — “Rails & Settlements Summit Montréal 2025”, speaker profile page · published March 2025
“…oversees the payments infrastructure organisation at fictional Northline Pay — three product lines and a group of about sixty engineers…”
What this does NOT establish: current employment or today’s team size — the bio was drafted for the fictional 2025 summit, carries no update date, and every figure in it is invented.
Shipped an instant-settlement platform handling four million transactions a month (fictional figures).
Fictional source — “Northline Pay launches InstantRail”, corporate press release · November 2024
“…InstantRail, the instant-settlement platform delivered by the payments infrastructure group, passed four million monthly transactions in late 2024…”
What this does NOT establish: that she personally shipped it — the release credits the group, not one person, so it supports the platform and the (fictional) volume only in part.
Spoke on bilingual engineering leadership (EN/FR) in Montréal.
Fictional source — “Bilingual Tech Montréal 2025”, event programme · May 2025
“…14:00 — ‘Leading between two languages’: Alexandra Fontaine-Ruiz on running EN/FR engineering teams in Montréal…”
What this does NOT establish: her own proficiency level in French — a programme entry shows the fictional session happened, not certified fluency.
Reviewer decision
A written reason is required to exclude a candidate.
decision pending
Director of Platform Engineering · fictional co: Cascadia Ledger
Grew a platform group from 8 to 45 engineers over four years.
Fictional source — “The Platform Builders Interviews, ep. 41”, podcast transcript · recorded 2024
“…we were eight engineers when I took the group, and forty-five by the close of year four…”
What this does NOT establish: exact dates or whether the group still exists — a retrospective fictional interview from 2024 about a fictional company.
Owned delivery of a B2B payments integration suite used by 200 merchants (fictional figure).
Fictional source — Cascadia Ledger engineering blog (archived post) · dated 2023
“…the B2B integration suite went live with its two-hundredth merchant this quarter; delivery sat with the platform group under Tomás Herrera-Lindqvist…”
What this does NOT establish: personal end-to-end ownership — the post credits the group “under” him, so it supports the claim only partially; the merchant count is a fictional milestone.
Reviewer decision
A written reason is required to exclude a candidate.
decision pending
Head of Engineering, Ledger Systems · fictional co: Meridian Loops
Ten years building reconciliation and ledger systems at Series A–C startups.
Fictional source — Montréal Ledger Systems Meetup, recording transcript · October 2024
“…ten years now on reconciliation and ledger systems, mostly Series A through C…”
What this does NOT establish: named employers or her current role — self-reported in a fictional talk, with no companies named and no dates given.
Maintains fictional open-source tooling for payments schema migrations.
Fictional source — “ledger-migrate” repository page, README · retrieved 2025
“…versioned schema migrations for double-entry payment ledgers. Maintainer: Priya N. Okafor, with community contributors…”
What this does NOT establish: payments-domain employment — open-source maintenance is community work; it touches the fictional domain without evidencing any role.
Reviewer decision
A written reason is required to exclude a candidate.
decision pending
Senior Director, Engineering Operations · fictional co: Boreal Circuit
Runs a hybrid engineering-hub program in Montréal (fictional company policy).
Fictional source — “Boreal Circuit doubles down on a hybrid Montréal hub”, tech-desk article · February 2025
“…the hybrid hub programme, run by Senior Director Marc-André Beaulieu-Sørensen, keeps anchor days in Montréal with distributed weeks…”
What this does NOT establish: how long he has run it, or that the fictional policy still stands in 2026 — the piece reports a single 2025 snapshot.
Mentors in a francophone engineering leadership cohort (fictional program).
Fictional source — “Francophone Engineering Leadership Cohort”, community forum mentors list · 2024
“…2024 mentors include Marc-André Beaulieu-Sørensen (fictional Boreal Circuit). Cohort sessions run in French; materials are bilingual…”
What this does NOT establish: his personal bilingual proficiency — mentoring a francophone cohort implies French engagement, but the post never assesses fluency, so it supports the claim only partially.
Reviewer decision
A written reason is required to exclude a candidate.
decision pending
Step 3 / 3
Open each source chip, read the fictional excerpt, and record a disposition for every claim. Then record an include / exclude decision for every candidate. Signing unlocks only when nothing is left unresolved — and any later change voids the signature until you re-sign.
0 / 9 evidence dispositioned · 0 / 4 candidate decisions recorded
Dispositions: Supported — the excerpt confirms the claim · Contradicted — the excerpt says otherwise · Not evidenced — the source does not address this claim (not the same as failing a criterion) · Unresolved — no decision yet. Every item needs a disposition, even for excluded candidates; every candidate needs a decision.
Reviewer: (demo) — a human professional.
Signing unlocks when every evidence item has a disposition (supported / contradicted / not evidenced) and every candidate has a recorded include / exclude decision.
This signature is a UI demonstration only. It carries no legal weight and refers to entirely fictional data. The signed snapshot records every disposition, every candidate decision and the reviewer note.